Machinery Regulation vs Cyber Resilience Act
Understand the overlap, differences, and compliance synergy between Machinery Regulation and the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA).
Core Definition
While Machinery Regulation focuses heavily on industrial regulation principles, the Cyber Resilience Act specifically targets the cybersecurity of products with digital elements. Compliance with Machinery Regulation provides a strong foundation, but does not completely satisfy CRA requirements. You will still need to ensure CRA-specific mandates like SBOM generation, secure by default configurations, and 24-hour vulnerability reporting to ENISA.
Key Compliance Steps for Machinery Regulation
- Map Existing Controls: Identify which Machinery Regulation controls map directly to CRA Annex I requirements (e.g., risk assessments and access control).
- Identify CRA Gaps: The CRA has strict product-centric requirements (like 5-year security updates and SBOMs) that Machinery Regulation might not explicitly mandate.
- Combine Documentation: Leverage your Machinery Regulation evidence as part of the CRA Technical Documentation package to ease compliance efforts.
How This Plays Out in Practice
The EU Machinery Regulation 2023/1230 explicitly cross-references cybersecurity for safety components, and CRA conformity can feed directly into machinery's essential health and safety requirements.
What to Watch For
Machinery Regulation focuses on physical safety outcomes; CRA focuses on the digital attack surface — a machine can be mechanically safe and still fail CRA's vulnerability-handling requirements.
Assess Your CRA Readiness
Evaluate your product's Cyber Resilience Act readiness using our interactive tool. Find exactly which of the 22 security requirements apply directly to Machinery Regulation.